Section 62 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) empowers the Court to make an interim provision order for a person before it has fully considered their application for a family provision order. A person must have an application for family provision on foot and establish that they have an urgent need for immediate provision whilst the substantive application is being considered.
Justice Meek of the Supreme Court of NSW recently set out the relevant principles or considerations that a Court must take into account when making an interim provision order in Byrd v Margiotta [2023] NSWSC 1556. These principles include:
Usually, a person making an application for an interim provision order would attempt to reach an agreement with the estate (the executor/administrator or person appointed to defend the family provision claim). These negotiations would usually be through the applicant’s solicitors and the estate’s solicitors. If the parties cannot reach any agreement, then the applicant would need to apply to the Court under section 62 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) for an interim provision order.
An application for an interim provision order can be a complex and costly process. Because it can become a further contested application before the Court, the application can significantly increase the costs of the overall dispute. Further, there can be technical or strategic reasons for making the application or not making the application that may have an effect on the final result of the overall proceedings. It is important that you get advice on any interim provision from lawyers with experience.
Our experienced estate dispute solicitors can advise you as an eligible person or executor/administrator of the estate on your rights to make or defend an application for an interim provision order. Contact our team today.
If you need any help, please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you. Or if in hurry, just call us now.
office@stephenwawn.com.au Mon – Fri 09:00-17:00
Contact us now
No part of these notes can be regarded as legal advice. Although all care has been taken in preparing all notes, readers must not alter their position or refrain from doing so in reliance on any of these notes. Stephen Wawn & Associates do not accept or undertake any duty of care to readers relating to any of these notes. All inquiries should be directed to Stephen Wawn & Associates.